Section 32: Problem 8 Solution
Working problems is a crucial part of learning mathematics. No one can learn topology merely by poring over the definitions, theorems, and examples that are worked out in the text. One must work part of it out for oneself. To provide that opportunity is the purpose of the exercises.
James R. Munkres
(a)
is non-empty and closed,
is a component of
. If
then
is empty otherwise it is not. So, suppose it is not. Theorem 24.1 tells us that
and all rays and intervals in
are connected. Then
and
are in the same component of
iff
does not intersect
. If
is bounded below by a point not in
, then let
be the greatest lower bound of
. Since
is closed,
(otherwise, let
,
, i.e.
is not the largest element of
, and every basis neighborhood of
has a from
where
, but then there is an element
, i.e.
cannot be an interior point of
). Hence, if there is a component containing a lower bound of
then it is of the form
. Similarly, if there is a component containing an upper bound of
then it is of the form
. Now, suppose that
is bounded below and above by points in
. Let
be its greatest lower bound and
be its least upper bound. Neither
nor
belongs to
(essentially, for the same reason). But for every
there are points
such that
, therefore,
. Hence,
.(b) Suppose
is a limit point of
. If
is in a component then, using (a), the component is a neighborhood of
that contains only one point in
, therefore, since the space is Hausdorff,
must be equal to that point. Suppose now,
. Then
and each neighborhood of
must contain infinite number of points in
. Suppose
are such points.
lies within an interval with endpoints in
and
that contains neither
nor
. Therefore,
is a limit point of
, but
is closed, so
. This contradicts the assumption that they are disjoint. Similarly,
cannot lie within
. To sum up, only points in
can be limit points of
, i.e.
is closed.(c) Using (a) and (b) we conclude that the components of
are open intervals or rays. Then
is an interval that does not contain points in
. Suppose
,
and
. Let
be the greatest lower bound of points in
. Then, as before,
and
contains no points in
. Let
be the lowest upper bound of points in
. Then
,
and
has no points in
. Therefore, it is a component of
with the endpoints in both
and
, and must have a point in
. Contradiction.Conclusion. For
choose those components of
that contains points in
(they do not contain points in
), and for
choose all other components. Since
intersects neither
nor
, we have open disjoint sets separating
and
.