Section 3: Problem 5 Solution
Working problems is a crucial part of learning mathematics. No one can learn topology merely by poring over the definitions, theorems, and examples that are worked out in the text. One must work part of it out for oneself. To provide that opportunity is the purpose of the exercises.
James R. Munkres
Let
and
be the following subsets of the plane:
(a) Show that
is an equivalence relation on the real line and
. Describe the equivalence classes of
.
(b) Show that given any collection of equivalence relations on a set
, their intersection is an equivalence relation on
.
(c) Describe the equivalence relation
on the real line that is the intersection of all equivalence relations on the real line that contain
. Describe the equivalence classes of
.
(a) RST hold for
(
,
and
). The classes of equivalence are those points the pairwise distances between which are integer numbers. Alternatively, we can say that the class of points equivalent to
is
.
contains some pairs such that the distance is 1, and, therefore, if
then
, implying
.
(b) If RST hold for any relation in the collection then they hold for any relation in the intersection. For example, if
for any
, then
for any
, and
, implying
. Similarly for the other properties.
(c) Every equivalence relation that contains
must have at least these pairs
:
(reflexivity),
(contains S),
(symmetry), and, by transitivity and symmetry,
and
. Let the set of these pairs be
. Then
is in the intersection. If we show that
is an equivalence relation itself, then it is the intersection (from (b) it follows that the intersection must be an equivalence relation, and, therefore, the intersection is an equivalence relation that is contained in any other equivalence relation that contains
).
But before we show that this is an equivalence relation, let us describe T less formally. T contains the following “equivalence classes” (we don’t know yet that these are equivalence classes before we show that T is an equivalence relation, but within these subsets every element is related to every element, while no elements from different subsets are related):
for
,
, and
for
and
.
R and S clearly hold for
. The transitivity needs a proof. Let
and
. If
or
then
holds. If
and
then
,
,
is an integer number (-2,-1,1 or 2),
,
. Therefore,
is an integer and both are in
, i.e. either
or
for some
. In either case,
.