Section 35*: Problem 9 Solution
Working problems is a crucial part of learning mathematics. No one can learn topology merely by poring over the definitions, theorems, and examples that are worked out in the text. One must work part of it out for oneself. To provide that opportunity is the purpose of the exercises.
James R. Munkres
(a) Let
be a collection of open subsets of
. Then for each
,
is open in
if there are finitely many open sets, and
is open in
as well. Now we need to show that
is a (closed) subspace of
. From the definition of the coherent topology on
it follows that the topology on
is finer than the subspace topology on
. We need to show that if
is open in
then there is some set
such that
and
is open in
for every
.
is a subspace of
for every
. For
let
be a set open in
such that
. Note that for
,
and for
,
. Let
. Then, for
,
is open in
. For
,
is open in
. Therefore, the subspace topology is finer than the topology on
, and, overall, we have that the topologies are equal. To show that
is a closed subspace of
we can take any point
and construct its neighborhood in
disjoint from
by taking the union of
for all
.(b) In the past we had the following fact: if a function is continuous on every space in a collection of subspaces covering the space and either all subspaces in the collection are open or all subspaces are closed and the collection is finite, then the function is continuous on the whole space. Here we have either the infinite union of closed subspaces or the infinite union of open subspaces
union one closed subspace
. If we knew that
where
is open in
and there is some
such that
then we could apply the result stated above. However, it might be that every neighborhood of some point in
intersects all spaces
. For example, suppose
and
is open in
iff for every
all
also in
. Note that every
is closed in
. Then
is
but there is no open set in
such that it is contained in any
. So we show the result directly.Let
be open in
. Then for every
,
which is open in
. Therefore,
is open in
.(c) Let
and
be closed disjoint subsets of
. Let
(it is a closed subspace of
) and
be defined on
such that
and
. We assume that
. Note that both
and
are closed and open in
and
is continuous. For every
, given a continuous function
such that
and
, we extend it to a continuous function
which satisfies the same property:
and
. We cannot directly apply the Tietze Extension Theorem because
may be not normal. However,
is normal. So we can extend
to a continuous function
as follows: first, we say that
and
, the function is still continuous (
and
are closed in
, hence, their intersection with
is closed in
and the continuity follows by the pasting lemma of Section 18), then, we extend it from the closed subset
onto
. Now, we define
to be equal to
on
,
on
and
on
(it is still continuous by the pasting lemma). For every
there is the minimal
such that
. We define
. Note that
is not defined for
and agrees with
for
. For
we define
and for
we define
. Note, again, that this definition agrees with all
. This implies that
which is continuous, and by (b),
is continuous. Since
and
,
separates
and
. Hence,
is normal.