Section 7: Problem 9 Solution
Working problems is a crucial part of learning mathematics. No one can learn topology merely by poring over the definitions, theorems, and examples that are worked out in the text. One must work part of it out for oneself. To provide that opportunity is the purpose of the exercises.
James R. Munkres
This exercise shows that one has to be careful in defining recursive functions, as an arbitrary recursive relation may “define” several functions or a function that does not exist.
(a) The formula
is not one to which the principle of recursive definition applies. Show that nevertheless there does exist a function
satisfying this formula. [Hint: Reformulate
so that the principle will apply and require
to be positive.]
(b) Show that the formula
of part (a) does not determine
uniquely. [Hint: If
is a positive function satisfying
, let
for
, and let
.]
(c) Show that there is no function
satisfying the formula
(a) The last expression can be rewritten as
. By taking the positive root we ensure that
takes positive values only, and, hence, always exists (as the sum of the two terms on the right will be always positive). In other words, we rewrite the last expression as
for
. Now, the recursive formula is well-defined, and the principle of recursive definition applies to it.
(b) Let
and
be two functions both satisfying the recursive relation described by
such that
,
,
,
, and for
,
(I am not sure why Munkres says
for
).
(c)
,
.